Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 00:00

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Prescription risk: Meds that could cause dementia - WFMZ.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ossett prostate cancer patient urges men to have checks - BBC
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are some signs he is deeply in love with you?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
A traveler infected with measles flew into Miami. What are the next steps? - Miami Herald
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New questions emerge from the new charges in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case - NBC News
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do very hot men ever feel attracted to an ugly woman? Why?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.